GUILT BY ASSOCIATION . . .

There has always been a significant factor in legal matters known as “guilt by association.”  Judicial rulings confirm that “bad company corrupts good . . .”

With the rise of analyzing everything psychologically in recent decades, we have a very real and troublesome twist on the reasonable conclusion of “guilt by association.”  It is now superseded and replaced with “guilt by accusation.”

Without my explaining, I’m sure you can easily come up with examples and applications in today’s world.  Here are some of mine:

ONE—–I first realized the application in marriage disputes and marriage counseling.  It is one of those handy tools that are easily employed to manipulate friends and professionals alike to take your side.  Just say that someone is controlling, and you gain immediate sympathy without evidence, and the other person is at a loss without defense.  Needless to say, that example is only the tip of the iceberg.

TWO—–“Intolerant” is perhaps the best tool or weapon to sling and make “guilt by accusation” stick.  Again, how do you defend against a charge of intolerance?

THREE—–“You don’t have the right to offend me” is another classic angle currently used to the point of absurdity.  Sadly, the courts have lost all sanity in bowing down to yet another wave of anti-God and anti-American ideology sweeping over this country—sweeping us away like a tsunami.

FOUR—–“Israel (or U.S.) military killed civilians” gets full press and ensuing international sentiment against the good guys.  Reality is—the other side is usually committing such atrocities more, by ten to one.

FIVE—–“We must be more reasonable and understanding with terrorists [who have all vowed to kill us].”  America’s unfounded guilt trip spread around the world the past four years is killing us now.

SIX—– Hate Crimes.  Thought Crimes.  (need I explain?)

SEVEN—–“Extremists are always wrong.”  (that would include Jesus)

EIGHT—–“You must limit your fight for life, family, and religious freedom to the democratic process and non-violence.  Anything more than that negates your cause—guilty, even if you just think or talk about it.”

—Where would that leave us with England 236 years ago?

—Where would that leave us with England 200 years ago?

—Where would that leave us with slavery 160 years ago?

—Where would that leave us with Germany 100 years ago?

—Where would that leave us with Germany and Japan 70 years ago?

—Now, where has that left us with God out of schools for 50 years?

—Now, where has that left us with killing a whole lot more babies than last Friday, for 40 years?

—Now, where has that left us with bowing to gay ‘rights’ for 30 years?

—Now, where does that leave us with the blitzkrieg dictatorship currently blowing up every single thing listed in this paragraph for 4 years?

—Now, where does this “guilt by accusation” (which we allow by free will, nationally and individually) leave us today, and tomorrow?

—Where does it leave the rest of our babies that are still alive?

—Where does it leave our marriages that are still God-ordained?

—Where does it leave our faith and freedom we still have to tell others about freedom from all guilt, with Jesus?

Is not this something worth fighting for, again, like others did for us?  What measures were they willing to use, for us?  What measures are we willing to use, for our children?

NINE—–Another example on the individual level, that affects the entire country:

This one explains the dramatic rise in child abuse for the past several decades.  We had an entire generation conditioned without authority and confidence in parenting.  They were told,

—“You don’t have the right to discipline with physical pain.”

—“You have to earn the respect of your children first.”

—“You have to reason with your children.”

—“If your children don’t act right, figure out what you are doing wrong.”

When parents start off feeling guilty and reluctant to discipline quickly enough to instill instant regret, they delay the inevitable.  Pressure builds and defiance escalates, and ultimately the parent lashes out abusively instead of authoritatively.

TEN—–Now the most volatile current “guilt by accusation”:

“Guns are the cause of violent crime.”  That gets a lot of mileage at a time like this.

Just say NO to gun control.  Don’t let anyone make you or anyone else feel guilty for owning guns.  It is what it means to be an American—FREE.

Gun control made last Friday’s horror possible, and all but one like it since 1950, and probably the next one.  Your gun could be the one to stop the next one.  Think about it.  Think about the lives you may be called to save, with deadly force.  You will be right before the Constitution, you will be right before your fellow citizens, and you will be right before God.

AND PRAY.

“THOROUGH INVESTIGATION”

“We will conduct a thorough investigation, and bring to justice those responsible [for 9-11-12 in Libya].”     —–U.S. commander-in-chief

Now, three and a half months later, the Secretary of State is scheduled to testify about 9-11-12 before Congress.

I conclude that “thorough investigation” is the political version of “kick the can down the road” in economics.

I also conclude that both are designed to destroy and trash this country.

SPIRITUAL MALNUTRITION DIAGNOSED

Most church members are so stuffed with pre-digested denominational theology that they can’t even taste it.  They don’t have to chew it, so they swallow it, and then regurgitate it further predigested for the next new member, thereby meeting the qualifications for approval by those who predigested it for them, and keeping them malnourished spiritual babies.

Now if you found that paragraph unnecessarily complex, you should try reading the theology books written for theology students.  I remember.  But their show goes on.

I can laugh about that now, personally.  But sadly, the typical theology student entering seminary, steps on a conveyor belt that drops him off in a church four years later, equipped to do what he was taught; but he really doesn’t know what happened to him.  (that analogy compliments of my nephew—a pastor)

I think of Martin Luther and others who wanted the Bible available to the common people in their language.  They got run out of town, and some even got run out of this world, because the idea threatened the “PDD” degree holders (Doctor of Pre-Digestion).

Someday I’ll write on SIBA—SIMPLE BASICS REVOLUTIONIZE THEOLOGY.